Peterson v. Dickey

8 Blackf. 427
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Blackf. 427 (Peterson v. Dickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. Dickey, 8 Blackf. 427 (Ind. 1847).

Opinion

ON the purchase of certain real estate, part of the purchase-money was paid, and promissory notes, payable at specified times with interest, were given for the residue. The vendor, at the time of the purchase, gave the vendée a title-bond, the condition of which stated that it was agreed between the parties, that if said notes and interest were not paid at maturity the bond should be void and the money paid forfeited to the vendor; or if on payment of said notes and interest as aforesaid, the vendor or his assigns should make a warranty deed in fee-simple for the property to the vendee or his assigns then the bond to be void. Held, that the vendee was not bound to pay the notes, but that he might abandon the contract and forfeit the-money paid.

If there be two pleas to an action, and a demurrer to one be incorrectly sustained, the final judgment in the cause, rendered for the defendant on another plea, will ndt be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Blackf. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-dickey-ind-1847.