Peterson v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Peterson v. City of Tacoma

246 P. 944, 139 Wash. 313, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 915

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJune 15, 1926

DocketNo. 19294. En Banc.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 246 P. 944 (Peterson v. City of Tacoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. City of Tacoma, 246 P. 944, 139 Wash. 313, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 915 (Wash. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Askren, J., while a judge of the superior court, presided at the trial of this case below and entered the judgment appealed from. He therefore bas taken no part here. The remaining judges are divided in their opinions and there is no majority, either for affirmance or reversal.

Therefore, there being no majority for the reversal of the judgment of the trial court, it necessarily stands affirmed, and the order of this court is that the judgment appealed from be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Askren, J., while a judge of the superior court, presided at the trial of this case below and entered the judgment appealed from. He therefore bas taken no part here. The remaining judges are divided in their opinions and there is no majority, either for affirmance or reversal.

Therefore, there being no majority for the reversal of the judgment of the trial court, it necessarily stands affirmed, and the order of this court is that the judgment appealed from be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 P. 944, 139 Wash. 313, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-city-of-tacoma-wash-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack