Peterson v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Peterson v. City of Tacoma

246 P. 944, 139 Wash. 313, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 915

Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1926·No. No. 19294. En Banc.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Askren, J., while a judge of the superior court, presided at the trial of this case below and entered the judgment appealed from. He therefore bas taken no part here. The remaining judges are divided in their opinions and there is no majority, either for affirmance or reversal.

Therefore, there being no majority for the reversal of the judgment of the trial court, it necessarily stands affirmed, and the order of this court is that the judgment appealed from be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Askren, J., while a judge of the superior court, presided at the trial of this case below and entered the judgment appealed from. He therefore bas taken no part here. The remaining judges are divided in their opinions and there is no majority, either for affirmance or reversal.

Therefore, there being no majority for the reversal of the judgment of the trial court, it necessarily stands affirmed, and the order of this court is that the judgment appealed from be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Peterson v. City of Tacoma, 246 P. 944, 139 Wash. 313, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 915 (Wash. 1926).

Pincite

246 P. 944 (Peterson v. City of Tacoma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related