Peterson v. City of Minneapolis
This text of 216 N.W. 228 (Peterson v. City of Minneapolis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant city from completing condemnation proceedings instituted pursuant to L. 1925, p. 676, c. 417, to acquire certain lands belonging to the plaintiff for the purpose of widening a city street.
The statute gives a right of appeal to the district court from the order of confirmation of the city council. We are unable to see that the plaintiff may not get appropriate relief upon appeal. If so an injunction should not he granted. Plaintiff’s brief states that an appeal has been taken.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 N.W. 228, 172 Minn. 604, 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-city-of-minneapolis-minn-1927.