Peterson v. Barry
This text of 4 Binn. 482 (Peterson v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a case of an extraordinary nature, in which the character of both parties is very much concerned. The circumstances proved to day are material. The defendant paid Wright six hundred dollars in six notes for one hundred dollars each, of the Farmers and Mechanics’ Bank. This sum, with twenty dollars drawn by the defendant afterwards from that bank, made six hundred and twenty, the whole of his credit in the bank. We wish to know from ^whence these six hundred dollars came, and the defendant will have an opportunity of showing this on another trial. On the whole we are of opinion that the case requires further explanation, and therefore that there should be a new trial.
New trial granted.
[Cited in 1 Clark, 456; 1 Phila. 281.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Binn. 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-barry-pa-1812.