Peterson Steels, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Peterson Steels, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 315

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1955

DocketNo. 58864; protests 213357-K, 233316-K, and 235310-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 315 (Peterson Steels, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson Steels, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 315 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are cold-drawn and annealed steel wire rods, valued at more than 6 cents per pound, measuring 0.328 inch, 0.265 inch, and 0.240 inch in diameter, alloyed with from 1.34 to 1.59 percent of chromium, imported in coils, and that said merchandise is the same in all material respects as the cold-drawn steel rods the subject of Abstracts 5798 and 49897. Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited decisions, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are cold-drawn and annealed steel wire rods, valued at more than 6 cents per pound, measuring 0.328 inch, 0.265 inch, and 0.240 inch in diameter, alloyed with from 1.34 to 1.59 percent of chromium, imported in coils, and that said merchandise is the same in all material respects as the cold-drawn steel rods the subject of Abstracts 5798 and 49897. Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited decisions, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cust. Ct. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-steels-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.