Petersime Incubator Co. v. Guthrie

9 A.2d 909, 137 Pa. Super. 532, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 74
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 20, 1939
DocketAppeal, 264
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 A.2d 909 (Petersime Incubator Co. v. Guthrie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petersime Incubator Co. v. Guthrie, 9 A.2d 909, 137 Pa. Super. 532, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 74 (Pa. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal was taken by defendant from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff by the Prothonotary of Chester County, for want of an affidavit of defense, five days after defendant’s second supplemental affidavit of defense and counter claim had been stricken off by the court.

The appeal must be quashed .on the authority of Pettit v. Clever, 219 Pa. 428, 67 A. 960. It was there held that no appeal lies from a judgment entered by the prothonotary, as of course, with no order of intervention by the court. If the judgment was improperly entered, relief from it must be asked from the court in which it was entered, and if the court denies such relief, an appeal may then be taken.

*534 Appeal quashed, without prejudice to the right of defendant to move the court below to strike off the judgment, within thirty days after the return of the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rihr v. Domke Et Ux.
62 A.2d 766 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.2d 909, 137 Pa. Super. 532, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petersime-incubator-co-v-guthrie-pasuperct-1939.