Petersen v. State

175 So. 3d 385, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14770, 2015 WL 5752604
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Petersen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2967
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 2015·No. No. 1D14-0789·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in methamphetamine containing 28 grams or more but less than 200 grams of pseudoephedrine and unlawful possession of a listed chemical (pseudoephedrine). The trial court sentenced him to concurrent seven-year prison terms.

This case was originally filed as an An-ders1 appeal. After initial review of the record, we ordered supplemental briefing on whether the trial court erred by admitting certain Williams2 rule evidence. Upon full review of the record and consideration of the parties’ supplemental briefs, we conclude no reversible error occurred at trial. We further find the sentences imposed, including costs, are lawful. Ac[386]*386cordingly, we affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER, SWANSON and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petersen v. State, 175 So. 3d 385, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14770, 2015 WL 5752604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

175 So. 3d 385 (Petersen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Williams v. State
110 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)