Petersen v. RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
747 N.W.2d 302, 480 Mich. 1187
Opinion
George V. PETERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Jeffery Klaft, David Rudicil, and Michael P. McCarthy, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for peremptory reversal, to remand, and to strike are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petersen v. RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT, 747 N.W.2d 302, 480 Mich. 1187 (Mich. 2008).
747 N.W.2d 302 (Petersen v. RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.