Petersen v. Rawls

Fourth Circuit

Petersen v. Rawls

65 F. App'x 501

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2003·No. No. 03-6563·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Allan A. Petersen appeals the district court’s order denying his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Petersen v. Rawls, No. CA-03-178-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Allan A. Petersen appeals the district court’s order denying his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Petersen v. Rawls, No. CA-03-178-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Petersen v. Rawls, 65 F. App'x 501 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

65 F. App'x 501 (Petersen v. Rawls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.