Petersen v. MAGNA CORPORATION
This text of 721 N.W.2d 580 (Petersen v. MAGNA CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rick PETERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
v.
MAGNA CORPORATION and Midwest Employers Casualty Company, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, and
Koleaseco and Citizens Insurance Company, BCN Transportation Services, Koleaseco and The Accident Fund Company, Magna Corporation and TIG Insurance Company, BCN Transportation Services and TIG Insurance Company, Serta Restokraft Mattress Company and Harleysville Lake States Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is also considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 N.W.2d 580, 477 Mich. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petersen-v-magna-corporation-mich-2006.