Petersen v. California
360 U.S. 314, 79 S. Ct. 1294, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1259, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 815
This text of 360 U.S. 314 (Petersen v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Petersen v. California, 360 U.S. 314, 79 S. Ct. 1294, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1259, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 815 (1959).
Opinion
PETERSEN
v.
CALIFORNIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Marvin E. Lewis for appellant.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Dion Holm and George Baglin for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
360 U.S. 314, 79 S. Ct. 1294, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1259, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petersen-v-california-scotus-1959.