Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.
This text of 10 R.I. Dec. 88 (Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Heard on motion to file additional count.
Inasmuch as the plaintiff did not accompany her motion with a copy of the proposed additional count, or otherwise give the substance of the proposed count, the Court is unable to rule on the matter.
The motion is therefore denied but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew such motion when accompanied by a copy of the proposed additional count.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 R.I. Dec. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-united-electric-railways-co-risuperct-1933.