Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.

10 R.I. Dec. 88

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 4, 1933·No. No. 87232·Published

Opinion

CHURCHILL, J.

Heard on motion to file additional count.

Inasmuch as the plaintiff did not accompany her motion with a copy of the proposed additional count, or otherwise give the substance of the proposed count, the Court is unable to rule on the matter.

The motion is therefore denied but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew such motion when accompanied by a copy of the proposed additional count.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHURCHILL, J.

Heard on motion to file additional count.

Inasmuch as the plaintiff did not accompany her motion with a copy of the proposed additional count, or otherwise give the substance of the proposed count, the Court is unable to rule on the matter.

The motion is therefore denied but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew such motion when accompanied by a copy of the proposed additional count.

Peters v. United Electric Railways Co., 10 R.I. Dec. 88 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

10 R.I. Dec. 88 (Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.