Peters v. State

147 So. 3d 1079, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035, 2014 WL 4774004
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 26, 2014
DocketNo. 5D13-2206
StatusPublished

This text of 147 So. 3d 1079 (Peters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peters v. State, 147 So. 3d 1079, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035, 2014 WL 4774004 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

MALTZ, H., Associate Judge.

We affirm the convictions and sentences imposed without prejudice to Appellant filing an appropriate post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 that addresses trial counsel’s examination of witness Danae Craig.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 So. 3d 1079, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035, 2014 WL 4774004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.