Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Peters v. State

Peters v. State

147 So. 3d 1079, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035, 2014 WL 4774004
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peters v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 2014·No. No. 5D13-2206·Published

Opinion

MALTZ, H., Associate Judge.

We affirm the convictions and sentences imposed without prejudice to Appellant filing an appropriate post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 that addresses trial counsel’s examination of witness Danae Craig.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters v. State, 147 So. 3d 1079, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035, 2014 WL 4774004 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

147 So. 3d 1079 (Peters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.