Peters v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peters v. State

948 So. 2d 849, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 2007 WL 258267

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 2007

DocketNo. 3D06-1930

StatusPublished

This text of 948 So. 2d 849 (Peters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peters v. State, 948 So. 2d 849, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 2007 WL 258267 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 (providing two years from the date the conviction and sentence become final to seek postconviction relief); Coppola v. State, 938 So.2d 507 (Fla.2006) (holding that Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), is not newly discovered evidence for postcon-viction relief purposes); Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that scoresheet errors do not render a plea illegal unless the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 (providing two years from the date the conviction and sentence become final to seek postconviction relief); Coppola v. State, 938 So.2d 507 (Fla.2006) (holding that Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), is not newly discovered evidence for postcon-viction relief purposes); Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that scoresheet errors do not render a plea illegal unless the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

948 So. 2d 849, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 2007 WL 258267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack