Peters v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peters v. State

726 So. 2d 368, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 852, 1999 WL 44158

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 1999

DocketNos. 97-1078, 97-1057

StatusPublished

This text of 726 So. 2d 368 (Peters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peters v. State, 726 So. 2d 368, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 852, 1999 WL 44158 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Andrew Charles Peters appeals his convictions and sentencing for multiple offenses, as well as the trial court’s revocation of his probation on a prior offense. Although we agree that the trial court erred in the admission of certain hearsay testimony, we conclude, after applying the harmless error test as set forth in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), that there is no reasonable possibility that the errors contributed to the convictions. Finding defendant’s remaining arguments to be without merit, the appealed decisions are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Andrew Charles Peters appeals his convictions and sentencing for multiple offenses, as well as the trial court’s revocation of his probation on a prior offense. Although we agree that the trial court erred in the admission of certain hearsay testimony, we conclude, after applying the harmless error test as set forth in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), that there is no reasonable possibility that the errors contributed to the convictions. Finding defendant’s remaining arguments to be without merit, the appealed decisions are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

726 So. 2d 368, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 852, 1999 WL 44158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack