Peters v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Peters v. State

148 So. 923, 25 Ala. App. 666

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 6, 1933

Docket7 Div. 974.

StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 923 (Peters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peters v. State, 148 So. 923, 25 Ala. App. 666 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

The indictment followed literally — the necessary description, etc., of premises involved being properly inserted — the form prescribed by the statute in the Code defining, etc., the offense. See Michie’s Code 1928, § 3289. It -was not subject to demurrer. See Code 1923, § 4527.

There is no bill of exceptions. No error being apparent of record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, Judge.

The indictment followed literally — the necessary description, etc., of premises involved being properly inserted — the form prescribed by the statute in the Code defining, etc., the offense. See Michie’s Code 1928, § 3289. It -was not subject to demurrer. See Code 1923, § 4527.

There is no bill of exceptions. No error being apparent of record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 So. 923, 25 Ala. App. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-state-alactapp-1933.