Peters v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

109 N.Y.S. 1142

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

McLENNAN, P. J., dissents, upon the ground that the evidence fails to establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 109 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

109 N.Y.S. 1142 (Peters v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.