Peters v. Moses

259 A.D. 307, 19 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6132
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 307 (Peters v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peters v. Moses, 259 A.D. 307, 19 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The opinion of Special Term indicates that it found from the evidence, supplemented by the court’s personal observations made pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, that there were noises incidental to the playing of outdoor music by defendant corporation’s orchestra which disturbed the peace of the neighborhood. This finding is amply supported by the evidence. Under the circumstances we think that the playing of the outdoor orchestra should be prohibited after eleven o’clock in the evening. The provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (§ 435-5.0) indicate a public policy prohibiting any such noises after that hour which disturb the quiet of residents. However, plaintiffs in the present case do not object to the music’s continuing until twelve o’clock on Saturday evenings and evenings preceding holidays. Accordingly, we direct the modification of subdivision one of the judgment appealed from by changing the provisions therein concerning the hour on and after which the outdoor orchestra is enjoined from playing to eleven p. M. on all days other than Saturdays and holidays, on which latter days it may continue to twelve midnight. As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs to appellants.

[309]*309Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untekmyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously modified as indicated in opinion, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the appellants. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andre v. Invenergy LLC
W.D. New York, 2022
Stiglianese v. Vallone
168 Misc. 2d 446 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1995)
Circus Disco Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority
409 N.E.2d 963 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Matherson
64 Misc. 2d 680 (Suffolk County District Court, 1970)
People v. Rapalski
29 Misc. 2d 988 (New York Town and Village Courts, 1961)
Town of Mount Pleasant v. Van Tassell
7 Misc. 2d 643 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
People v. Arkow
204 Misc. 635 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 307, 19 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-moses-nyappdiv-1940.