Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Peters v. Monroe Oil & Fertilizer Co.

Peters v. Monroe Oil & Fertilizer Co.

123 S.E. 618, 158 Ga. 523, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 291
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 27, 1924
DocketNo. 4078
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 S.E. 618 (Peters v. Monroe Oil & Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peters v. Monroe Oil & Fertilizer Co., 123 S.E. 618, 158 Ga. 523, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 291 (Ga. 1924).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The motion for new trial consists only of the usual general grounds. No error of law is alleged to have been committed on the trial of the case. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Claim. Before Judge Fortson. Walton superior court. October 26, 1923. J. G. Knox, for plaintiff in error. B. L. & jS'. G. Gox and K. W. Roberts, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aud v. Aud
34 S.E.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Blount
140 S.E. 496 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 S.E. 618, 158 Ga. 523, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-monroe-oil-fertilizer-co-ga-1924.