Peters v. Miller
This text of 114 S.E. 640 (Peters v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “ A general warranty of title in a deed, against the claims of all persons, covers defects in the title though known to the purchaser at the time of taking the deed.” Civil Code (1910), §§ 4195, 4194; Amos v. Cosby, 74 Ga. 793; Osburn v. Pritchard, 104 Ga. 145, 146 (30 S. E. 656); Lowery v. Yawn, 111 Ga. 62, 63 (36. S. E. 826).
2. The amended grounds of the motion for new trial are but an elaboration of the general grounds that the verdict was without evidence to support it.
■3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.
4. Applying to the facts of this case the principle ruled in the first headnote, the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 S.E. 640, 154 Ga. 500, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-miller-ga-1922.