Peters v. Miller

114 S.E. 640, 154 Ga. 500, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 404
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 18, 1922
DocketNo. 3123
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 S.E. 640 (Peters v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peters v. Miller, 114 S.E. 640, 154 Ga. 500, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 404 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. “ A general warranty of title in a deed, against the claims of all persons, covers defects in the title though known to the purchaser at the time of taking the deed.” Civil Code (1910), §§ 4195, 4194; Amos v. Cosby, 74 Ga. 793; Osburn v. Pritchard, 104 Ga. 145, 146 (30 S. E. 656); Lowery v. Yawn, 111 Ga. 62, 63 (36. S. E. 826).

2. The amended grounds of the motion for new trial are but an elaboration of the general grounds that the verdict was without evidence to support it.

■3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

4. Applying to the facts of this case the principle ruled in the first headnote, the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lifsey v. Finn
145 S.E. 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 640, 154 Ga. 500, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-miller-ga-1922.