Peters v. McVey

52 P. 896, 85 Kan. 393, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 79
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedApril 9, 1898
DocketNo. 10,608
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 P. 896 (Peters v. McVey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peters v. McVey, 52 P. 896, 85 Kan. 393, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 79 (kan 1898).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Action by the appellant to recover from R. E. McVey $3124.75, alleged to be due for merchandise purchased from them by McVey.

McVey admitted the indebtedness, but alleged it was not due at the time the action was brought.

The jury found that the debt was not due when the action was brought, and the notes which were taken by the plaintiffs from the defendant were accepted as payment of the amount sued on. There appears to be sufficient testimony to sustain this finding. It does not appear that the entire contract of the parties was in writing, and so far as it is in writing it is vague [394]*394■and uncertain. .The testimony of the defendant was, therefore, admissible as to what the contract between, the parties was, and many of the facts and circumstances in the case tend to support the testimony'of the •defendant and the finding of the jury.

There is nothing substantial to the objections made to the rulings upon the testimony, and we think the instructions of the court fairly presented the case to the .jury.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bair v. School District No. 141 of Smith County
146 P. 347 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 P. 896, 85 Kan. 393, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-mcvey-kan-1898.