Peters v. Macmillan Book Co.
134 N.Y.S. 1143
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See, also, 60 Misc. Rep. 420, 112 N. Y. Supp. 339.
KRUSE, J., dissents, upon the ground that,' although the case is not within the scaffold statute (no structure was being erected, painted, or repaired), the evidence shows that the ladder was an improper appliance for doing the work which the plaintiff was directed to do.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peters v. Macmillan Book Co., 134 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
134 N.Y.S. 1143 (Peters v. Macmillan Book Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Peters
60 Misc. 420 (New York Supreme Court, 1908)