Peters v. Knott Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Peters v. Knott Corp.

191 Misc. 898, 82 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3191

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 191 Misc. 898 (Peters v. Knott Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peters v. Knott Corp., 191 Misc. 898, 82 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The checking facilities maintained by defendant, as disclosed by this record, did not constitute a checkroom within the meaning of section 201 of the General Business Law. Even if it were a checkroom, the evidence presented a question of fact as to whether the notice specified in section 206 had been properly posted by defendant.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event.

MacCrate, Fennelly and Golden, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI