Peters v. Kerr

22 How. Pr. 3
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Leonard, Justice.

The defendant cannot be committed to jail on suspicion, nor can any order be made that would have that result, unless it be admitted or proven that the defendant can comply with the order asked for.

The defendant’s statement is, no doubt, very unsatisfactory to a creditor, and gives rise to a suspicion that he may be concealing money or property, but that does not warrant the order for which the plaintiff asks.

The application is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters v. Kerr, 22 How. Pr. 3 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).

22 How. Pr. 3 (Peters v. Kerr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Trustees of the Board of Publication & Sabbath School Work
22 Misc. 645 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Serven v. Lowerre
23 N.Y.S. 1052 (New York County Courts, 1893)
Columbian Institute v. Cregan
3 N.Y. St. Rep. 287 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1886)