Peters v. Kerr
22 How. Pr. 3
Opinion
The plaintiff must establish that the defendant has the money or means before such an order can be made.
The defendant cannot be committed to jail on suspicion, nor can any order be made that would have that result, unless it be admitted or proven that the defendant can comply with the order asked for.
The defendant’s statement is, no doubt, very unsatisfactory to a creditor, and gives rise to a suspicion that he may be concealing money or property, but that does not warrant the order for which the plaintiff asks.
The application is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peters v. Kerr, 22 How. Pr. 3 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).
22 How. Pr. 3 (Peters v. Kerr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Trustees of the Board of Publication & Sabbath School Work
22 Misc. 645 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Serven v. Lowerre
23 N.Y.S. 1052 (New York County Courts, 1893)
Columbian Institute v. Cregan
3 N.Y. St. Rep. 287 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1886)