Peters v. Huttel
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/7/2023 TYRONE PETERS, Plaintiff, No. 15-cv-9274 (NSR) -against- ORDER CORRECTION OFFICER HUTTEL et al., Defendants.
NELSON S. ROMAN, United States District Judge: By way of background, a 6-day jury trial is scheduled to begin on May 15, 2023. The remaining claims to be tried before a jury is pro se Plaintiff Tyrone Peters’ (“Plaintiff”) Eighth Amendment excessive use of force claim against Correction Officer Daniel Huttel and failure to intervene claims against Correction Officer Jeffrey Erns and Sergeant Duane Malark. (See Joint Pretrial Statement, ECF No. 162.) The claims arise out of an incident that occurred on November 21, 2012, while Plaintiff was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility. (See id.) The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s affirmation of service, which attaches a copy of his application for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, dated March 28, 2023.! (ECF No. 167.) In Plaintiff’s writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, Plaintiff seeks to secure Timothy Scott (“Mr. Scott”) as a witness. (See id.) Plaintiff states that “Mr. Scott is a material witness whose testimony is paramount to Plaintiff’s case.” (/d.) In the alternative, Plaintiff requests to use Mr. Scott’s deposition at trial. (/d.) Plaintiff states, and a search through the N.Y. State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision incarcerated lookup website confirms, that Mr. Scott (DIN #84A0829)
| As of the date of this memorandum endorsement, the Court has not yet received the actual application for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum.
was released from Wende Correctional Facility on June 5, 2019 and is now out on parole. Plaintiff also states that his attempts to contact Mr. Scott have been unsuccessful. “[A] district court has discretion to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to compel a parolee's attendance when “necessary to bring him into court to testify or for trial.” Davidson v.
Desai, 964 F.3d 122, 125 (2d Cir. 2020). In addition, “the party seeking a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum bears the burden of demonstrating necessity.” Id. at 131. “[A] writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is an “extraordinary measure” that should be taken only when alternatives are insufficient.” Id. at 131 (internal quotations and citations omitted). The Court notes that the parties are currently briefing on their motions in limine, and based on Defendants’ opening papers, Defendants are seeking to preclude the deposition designation of Mr. Scott. (See ECF No. 164 at 9.) The Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff’s writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. Plaintiff has not made the necessary showing that Mr. Scott would provide material testimony. See United States v. Paracha, No. 03-CR-1197 (SHS), 2018 WL 3238824, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 3,
2018) (denying a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum because party failed to make a necessary showing that the witness would provide material testimony.”) Plaintiff merely states in his application that “Mr. Scott is a material witness whose testimony is paramount to Plaintiff’s case.” (See ECF No. 167.) However, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to submit a renewed application for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum that includes an affidavit that describes the testimony that Plaintiff seeks from Mr. Scott, an explanation of why his testimony is material, and Plaintiff’s efforts to contact Mr. Scott. Should Plaintiff wish to renew his request for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, he must do so on or before April 20, 2023. The Court RESERVES JUDGMENT on Plaintiff’s request to designate Mr. Scott by deposition at trial, given that such issue is currently being briefed upon in the motions in /imine. The Clerk of the Court is kindly directed to mail a copy of this order to pro se Plaintiff and show service on the docket.
Dated: April 7, 2023 RDERED: White Plains, NY Sao —_ > N-NECSON ROMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EO Feo Eula 8 tes HOU EE □□□ | Date:4 /3 / 2023 eyo □□□ □ Maikid States Disthch Cool 4 ww os U.S. LES TCT JUDGE
□ Ageemetion gf □□□□□□□ oc AAW Ne
| Covredkvon Ogieers Hethel, CN Case ws cen □□□□ Ty lasts. Qrcpeadenbe wabe Gone _efsodents- Respondents s pocuMENT ] 5 ecprontcaLty FILED Cy . . ~ “ao Cowady, of Franklin . ) ss: oe Mh DATE FILED: 4/3/2023
Jt. Wy von a Peles HOFAABREL Makes the Rellow ma. OA weomaty 20. penalhes of Perjury. | TT am the Pledakg -RaMioner in the olvove-eatled acthon. 2) Qa Morch 28 -o02%, § Placed tna eeoled pock- Lowry gow rue anh exact cop 4 og the anclesed papers identipied as □ □□□□ \hods Compas. AA “Teeth conden. t joy ON a sna ASEM. \, y □□□□□□ Or —tmeod fay depesdhag the Same in a Marler ok the U bck, □□
308 Qrrarvie pees Sh 22 Liberty a Fe
AL, Tyeone PeNoes & OH+AYQBLI, Sreues under the penalty £f_P □□□□□□□ Rhek on Mare 28,2023, T did mail We obouc mentanel □ documents and thet The Fereqs cag, is. Vrue and Correct. □□ xecukids Marda 2a202q Signed: Tyrone Peles tou dere tERs
hnnn eninge Upstore Corredionel Facty, sane
i Malone, Mes MoKA 12953
More 28, 26235 0
_| Me neralle. Sudge Ne\soa Ss. Roman □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
+ Boo Qoervopas Sk. a Wihtke Plodas, AQ weboy le Pike N Wolte\, ek ol --# GWA Case 1S. Cy 4274 (INS®~ □□□□□□□ dor Tek ok Wolbeas ANA Test, candunn nn
| Dear. Sudge fh sor S Roman, inne
of Q War abou’ Vevday Mardy 24,2623 _ Plata Pk Avon
mara | Melerial Wihacss - Vim Sth. Sesh ast ABIZA woes rel eased Ave en Pris cal Nocey Facdty i Plant has. Aes ea be, mY andlor. o\\ . \ofer moda A □□□□ Wr. Tan sth 4 Scott leuk has been une, Zaceassfal, Plawike —_Doeces ~ Bivrsron of Pav cle , as We. Ses chowd be en, □□□□□□□ | ce Me. Se alts \ SB _ Ov “MeVercal AUS Wines, whe Se test Marg □□□
OL, aw on Placnk 0 respectful, subs oaks © Wek of Woloens Co AA Test Paco adum. de Secure. We Vness, OW ently. Sesh. In. □□□ LalWeenatice. » Pleratver tequest 45 use We. Seeilt's Degeethon ob Te
Clo: MYS-AG feo rect pay Geto mlrel | —2thbety Ao Pekecs BO+AASEE NY NY ivooS Plaity- Packs Va Prose □□
PoAx. 260) OOO
United Slates Detad Cod
ge Peltonen Week of Helnens, □□□□□□ = agoanshi Ad Testi pi □□□□□ Correction Ogreers ‘Wall ekels Gi A Case 421
Te: Henevalle, Dudge Melsen S Moma
P at Koncy. ph Tyrone PeNevs Hoa md Be), respect pally | □□□□□ fe —Tamethy Geet, whe was imprisoned ak Whe Weada □□□□□□□□ | Ky ak Madea, 1.Y., te Mow 00. Pavele Aim he □□□□□□□ amd ler? Contech □□□ Ve Nevo XY ok State be acd. 1 Pacol
Dwisce of Paced and Reger mead of Las, Bourdk uF □□□□□□□
Meany Nes York 122%eb, 15 & Melerroal Wh por The Placaks pe in the aloeve Case Mneak is seb Pov Teak o0..May
Whevepeve, Peltioner pray Brak Bre Clack of this Gor toe ee CS ects vf x. ine meded 4. ASSRe & ABS OE Wolo ees, Cea ad Veer if □□□□□□□ the NYS. Doces, Purssen of Porcle and NepaAd Wert of baw hb beng, ON may Seok #840 8% 24, lefore. Wve Cou’ 4s □□□□ □ in This tase and te be retirnd ts NYS boccs, bio. of □□□□□□ | S&S See TN OS Wis case io d eposed of i
□□□ □□ Navel 28, 202% ec Pespockoully Sdometel, Trove Petars Hod |S NS. MMcrney Craneeah, Ty Aone PETERS WO4ASS □□ ne Libeck, SEB” RO ese Placa - Paition
PURPLE HEART rox : !
ae, © □□ c □□ 3 ay a gOS Oe 7g ‘> □□ 8 □□ : = Se □□ a 5 “A | ac oY on cme □ | 4 24 5 □ : _ uy □□ | sO CUM 2 □□□ | a - = □ cf io "Z O ¢ | uw 2 “2 2: i 2, □ et : h J a 8 3 | 5 OE COO 2 | — a 622d 0 ge 54,4'°.0 Se 6 OQ o-@- 3 pe SEU Oo F 4) eceneeerece mene = J Ge ° gv ee u RB L tag Bo pee i 23 ee 6g ick | Sx yee SBS lho | PD et SO GF fo i oe bee 2 =~ © Boi) © jen) □□ a pend PE □ B8Su |: pee) Eka OnZ [= lee 4 PERE □ hu Sul | Hadi eae Balt sl Le □□ - a0 aes _ > ~ost Z (Soren □□
| a □ su 2 2 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peters v. Huttel (Peters v. Huttel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.