Peters v. Hubbard
This text of Peters v. Hubbard (Peters v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
04/23/2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 20-0087
DA 20-0087
ROGER D.PETERS and ALED CARRIE A.PETERS, APR 23 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Plaintiffs and Appellees, Court State of Montana
v. ORDER
DOUGLAS L. HUBBARD and NATHAN L. HUBBARD,
Defendants and Appellants.
On April 17,'2020, Appellees Roger D. and Carri A.Peters(Peters)filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to File Appellant Brief. Peters assert that Appellants, Douglas L. and Nathan L. Hubbard (Hubbards) filed their Notice of Appeal on February 10, 2020. The District Court record was filed February 21,2020,and the transcripts ofhearings were filed March 13, 2020. Rule 13(1), M. R. App. P., requires Appellants to serve and file their opening brief within 30 days after the date on which the record is filed. Peters assert the record was complete on March 13, 2020, when the transcripts were filed such that Hubbards's opening brief was due Monday, April 13, 2020; Hubbards failed to file their opening brief or request extension; and thus, their appeal should be dismissed. In response, Peters filed Appellants' Motion to Late File For Extension of Time to File Appellants' Opening Brief. Hubbards's counsel asserts that, "Due to the COVID-19 shelter in place State and Federal orders and the logistics and confusion created by bffice staff working remotely from home, Appellants' counsel's staff missed getting the briefing schedule calendared.” Counsel further advises the parties are scheduled for mediation April 24, 2020. Given the very unique circumstances of the COVID-19 pandeinic and the understandable confusion necessarily created from transitioning office staffto immediately work from home,we conclude Hubbards have shown good cause for extension oftime to file their opening brief. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Appellees' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to File Appellant Brief is DENIED. IT IS FURTFIER ORDERED that Appellants shall have thirty days from the date of this Order within which to prepare, file, and serve their opening brief. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record. DATED this i ftl-I13' of April, 2020.
(9-31 )411,_ Justices
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Peters v. Hubbard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-hubbard-mont-2020.