Peters v. Duke
This text of 1 White & W. 124 (Peters v. Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 304. Bond for hire of county convicts, suit on; disqualification of judge. In a suit upon a bond executed under the provisions of art. 3604, Rev. Stats., for the hire of a county convict, the county judge has no such interest in the suit as would disqualify him from trying the cause.
§ 305. Hirer; his liability, when fixed. The hirer of a convict is not liable upon his bond, where convict has escaped, for the amount of the bond, or any part thereof, until the bond becomes due; because he may, by terms of the statute, if he re-arrests the convict before the bond becomes due, so fix his liability as to limit it to the pay due only for the time that such convict remained with him [Eev. Stats, art. 3605], and a suit brought upon such bond, before its maturity, is prematurely brought, and cannot be maintained.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 White & W. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-duke-texapp-1882.