Peters v. Chamberlain
13 N.Y.S. 94, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 543, 59 Hun 622, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 972
This text of 13 N.Y.S. 94 (Peters v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peters v. Chamberlain, 13 N.Y.S. 94, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 543, 59 Hun 622, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 972 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
Opinion
The facts in this case are similar to those in the case of Freeman v. Electric Lighting Co., ante, 93, (decided herewith,) except that the motion was denied, instead of being granted; and for the reasons stated in that opinion the order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, as against the respondent Botsford, and the motion granted. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 N.Y.S. 94, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 543, 59 Hun 622, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-chamberlain-nysupct-1891.