Peters v. Barry Manufacturing Co.

385 So. 2d 1263, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4231
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 19, 1980
DocketNo. 11622
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 385 So. 2d 1263 (Peters v. Barry Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peters v. Barry Manufacturing Co., 385 So. 2d 1263, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4231 (La. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

SCHOTT, Judge.

On our own motion we required appellant to show cause why his appeal taken on May 6, 1980, from a judgment rendered and notice of judgment mailed on April 8, 1980, should not be dismissed.

Pursuant to LSA C.C.P. Art. 5003 the last day for appealing from this judgment of the First City Court was April 21, 1980. The motion for appeal contains the state[1264]*1264ment that the exception to the expiration of the appeal period is waived by appellees. However, the timely filing of an appeal is essential for the Court of Appeal to have jurisdiction over the matter and consent of opposing counsel cannot cure this defect. Jones v. Starr, 295 So.2d 50 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1974).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilcrease v. Gilcrease
438 So. 2d 658 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 So. 2d 1263, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-barry-manufacturing-co-lactapp-1980.