Peters (Kem) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 2022·No. 84231·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KEM PETERS, No. 84231 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.

FEB 2 5 2022 EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By 6-Vt•

DOWN CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion for own recognizance release and setting reasonable bail. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Erika D. Ballou, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion for own recognizance release and setting reasonable bail, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

A-albati) ,

Stiglich Herndon

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4.61t9s, oca-tsg

1.41M

cc: Hon. Erika D. Ballou, District Judge Kem Peters Adras & Altig Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF

NEVADA

2

c.)) IY47A ”Fiffyr

• tE`tt:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters (Kem) v. State, (Neb. 2022).

Peters (Kem) v. State (Peters (Kem) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)