Peters Creek v. Washington Presbytery

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 29, 2014
Docket264 WAL 2014
StatusPublished

This text of Peters Creek v. Washington Presbytery (Peters Creek v. Washington Presbytery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peters Creek v. Washington Presbytery, (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

PETERS CREEK UNITED : No. 263 WAL 2014 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the v. : Order of the Commonwealth Court : : WASHINGTON PRESBYTERY OF : PENNSYLVANIA AND REVEREND L. : RUS HOWARD AND ROBERT J. ELMES : : : : PETITION OF : PETERS CREEK : UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AND : REVEREND L. RUS HOWARD AND : ROBERT J. ELMES :

RICHARD L. ST. CLAIR, MARY G. ST. : No. 264 WAL 2014 CLAIR, HARRY R. BROBERG, ONA D. : BROBERG, JANET DEGRANGE, : RONALD A. DEGRANGE, JOHN M. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the MCMURRAY, CLAIRE V. AGARWAL, : Order of the Commonwealth Court MARIAN H. JOCHEM, RAMAKRISHNA : AGARWAL, CLARK L. GABLE, SUE : SMITH, CAROL GABLE, AUDREY : VANDERAAR, WILLIAM D. HARMON, : JUDY MAYER, GEORGE E. MAYER, : PH.D., JAN FICKTER, BETTY N. : MONAGHAN, EDWARD L. MILLER, : RUTH LEWIS, JAMES L. SIMPSON, : KEVIN L. SCRIVO, ARDETH D. : SIMPSON, WILLIAM B. PHILIPS, : CHRISTINE SCRIVO, VICKIE PHILIPS, : W. BENNETT LEWIS, JILL A. BROWER, : LOUISE H. CARMICHAEL, MARY ANNE : HARMON, J.W. CARMICHAEL, : JACKSON BROWER, JAMES P. LESLIE, : JR., ROSE MARIE LESLIE, REBECCA : HARMON SCHRIEBER, WILLIAM : SHADES, KEITH C. SHADER, CATHY : SHADER, ALBERT C. BROBERG, : KAREN C. BROBERG, TOGETHER : CONSTITUTING THE "TRUE CHURCH" : OF PETERS CREEK UNITED : PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, AND ON : BEHALF OF ALL OTHER MEMBERS OF : THE CONGREGATION, : : Respondents : : : v. : : : PETERS CREEK UNITED : PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, : : Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and Motion for Leave to File Answer Nunc Pro Tunc are DENIED.

[263 and 264 WAL 2014] - 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Peters Creek v. Washington Presbytery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-creek-v-washington-presbytery-pa-2014.