Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Peterman v. Pataki

Peterman v. Pataki

21 A.D.3d 1387, 801 N.Y.S.2d 212
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2005
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.3d 1387 (Peterman v. Pataki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterman v. Pataki, 21 A.D.3d 1387, 801 N.Y.S.2d 212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (James W. McCarthy, A.J.), entered August 25, 2004. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of Oneida Indian Nation of New York and Ray Halbritter to dismiss the third amended complaint upon the grounds of failure to join an indispensable party and lack of a justiciable controversy.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.D.3d 1387, 801 N.Y.S.2d 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterman-v-pataki-nyappdiv-2005.