Peterkin v. Harvey
This text of 244 A.D. 728 (Peterkin v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a mandamus proceeding to compel the reinstatement of petitioners in their respective positions in the civil service in the department of public works, borough of Queens, and for the recovery of their salaries during the period of suspension, peremptory mandamus order modified by striking out the provisions thereof requiring the payment to petitioners of back pay for the period from May 31, 1933, to the date of their reinstatement, and, as so modified, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondents, on the authority of Matter of Barmonde v. Kaplan (266 N. Y. 214). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterkin-v-harvey-nyappdiv-1935.