Peterkin v. Harvey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peterkin v. Harvey

244 A.D. 728

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a mandamus proceeding to compel the reinstatement of petitioners in their respective positions in the civil service in the department of public works, borough of Queens, and for the recovery of their salaries during the period of suspension, peremptory mandamus order modified by striking out the provisions thereof requiring the payment to petitioners of back pay for the period from May 31, 1933, to the date of their reinstatement, and, as so modified, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondents, on the authority of Matter of Barmonde v. Kaplan (266 N. Y. 214). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a mandamus proceeding to compel the reinstatement of petitioners in their respective positions in the civil service in the department of public works, borough of Queens, and for the recovery of their salaries during the period of suspension, peremptory mandamus order modified by striking out the provisions thereof requiring the payment to petitioners of back pay for the period from May 31, 1933, to the date of their reinstatement, and, as so modified, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondents, on the authority of Matter of Barmonde v. Kaplan (266 N. Y. 214). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Peterkin v. Harvey, 244 A.D. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 728 (Peterkin v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related