Peter Vinal v. SunTrust Mortgage Incorporate
This text of 583 F. App'x 269 (Peter Vinal v. SunTrust Mortgage Incorporate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Peter S. Vinal seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant SunTrust Mortgage Inc.’s motion to dismiss Vinal’s complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and dismissing SunTrust as a defendant. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Vinal seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as the claims against Defendant Safeguard Properties, LLC, remain pending in the district court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. See Dickens v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 677 F.3d 228, 229-30 (4th Cir.2012) (holding that this court is required to inquire into its jurisdiction sua sponte).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peter-vinal-v-suntrust-mortgage-incorporate-ca4-2014.