Peter v. Wojcicki

• Court: District Court, D. Utah
• Decided: April 11, 2022
• Docket: 2:22-cv-00006
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

MARIA PETER, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v.

SUSAN WOJCICKI, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00006-JNP-CMR Defendants. Judge Jill N. Parrish

Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero issued a Report and Recommendation that the court dismiss the plaintiffs’ action with prejudice. Judge Romero notified the plaintiffs that a failure to file a timely objection to her recommendation could waive any objections to it. No objection was filed within the allotted time. Because no party objected to the Report and Recommendation, any argument that it was in error has been waived. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court will decline to apply the waiver rule only if “the interests of justice so dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it is not clearly erroneous. Thus, the court finds that the interests of justice do not warrant deviation from the waiver rule and ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The court DISMISSES this action with prejudice. DATED April 11, 2022. BY THE COURT: . He N. PARRISH United States District Judge