Peter v. Wojcicki
This text of Peter v. Wojcicki (Peter v. Wojcicki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 * * *
4 MARIA PETER, MICHAEL PETER, JULIKA Case No.: 2:21-cv-02026-APG-EJY BERGER, and JAROLIN BERGER, 5 Plaintiffs, ORDER 6 v. 7 SUSAN DIANE WOJCICKI, WILLIAM 8 HENRY CATES, STEPHANE BANCEL, and ALBER BOURLA, 9 Defendants. 10 11 On November 8, 2021, Plaintiff Maria Peter, proceeding pro se, filed a proposed complaint 12 which lists three additional plaintiffs. ECF No. 1-1. However, Peter neither paid the $402 filing fee 13 nor filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which she must do pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 14 1915(a)(1) and the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada Local Rule LSR 1-1 if she wishes 15 to proceed without paying the mandatory filing fee. LSR 1-1 states: “Any person who is unable to 16 prepay the fees in a civil case may apply to the court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The 17 application must be made on the form provided by the court and must include a financial affidavit 18 disclosing the applicant’s income, assets, expenses, and liabilities.” 19 Further, Plaintiff is advised that a person acting pro se may not represent other people. Under 20 28 U.S.C. § 1654, pro se litigants have the right to plead and conduct their own cases but have no 21 authority to represent anyone other than themselves. Cato v United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.1 22 (9th Cir. 1995); C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987). As 23 such, if any plaintiff named in the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1) other than Maria Peter wishes to pursue 24 an action in this Court, such plaintiff must file his/her own complaint in a new and separate case and 25 submit either a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402 filing fee. 26 The Court shall retain Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1-1) but will not file the Complaint 27 unless and until Maria Peter timely pays the $402 filing fee or files a complete application to proceed 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff the 2 approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner as well as the document 3 entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before December 15, 2021, Plaintiff shall either: (1) 5 file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner, in compliance with 28 6 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and LSR 1-1; or (2) pay the $402 fee for filing a civil action, which includes the 7 $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this Order, the 9 Court will recommend dismissal of this action without prejudice. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court will retain Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF 11 No. 1-1), but will not file it at this time. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any plaintiff other than Maria Peter who is named in 13 Ms. Peter’s Complaint (ECF No. 1-1) wishes to pursue an action in this Court, such plaintiff must 14 file his/her own complaint in a new and separate case and submit either a complete application to 15 proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $402 filing fee. 16 Dated this 15th day of November, 2021. 17 18
19 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20
23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Peter v. Wojcicki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peter-v-wojcicki-nvd-2021.