Peter v. Butler
1 Leigh 285
Opinion
The only point of law involved in the decision, was the question of jurisdiction. This court concurred with the chancellor, that a claim, arising on a contract of bailment made out of Virginia, against a nonresident of Virginia, is such a claim for debt, for which the foreign attachment in chancery is a proper remedy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peter v. Butler, 1 Leigh 285 (Va. 1829).
1 Leigh 285 (Peter v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Robertson
266 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Jones's Adm'r v. Crews
64 Ala. 368 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Lancaster v. Wilson
27 Va. 624 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Zerega v. McDonald
30 F. Cas. 930 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia, 1873)
Bank of the United States v. Merchants Bank
1 Va. 573 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1843)