PETER THOMAS BYRA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

268 So. 3d 207

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

PETER THOMAS BYRA, ) DOC #948219, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1297 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 10, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County, Keith P. Spoto, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BADALAMENTI, Judge.

Peter Byra pleaded no contest to felony battery and was sentenced to a

thirty-six-month term of probation. He appeals the trial court's revocation order and the

resulting sentence of three years' imprisonment. We write only to address a duplicative

judgment entered by the trial court. After careful review, we remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate the March 12, 2018, duplicative judgment of guilt, which

improperly adjudicated Byra guilty a second time for the underlying felony battery

conviction. We affirm the revocation order and resulting sentence without comment.

"If probation or community control is revoked, the court shall adjudge the

probationer or offender guilty of the offense charged and proven or admitted, unless he

or she has previously been adjudged guilty. . . ." § 948.06(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2017)

(emphasis added). Here, on April 6, 2016, the trial court entered a written judgment

adjudicating Byra guilty of the underlying offense, felony battery. The probation office

subsequently filed an affidavit of violation of probation, alleging that Byra violated

particular terms of his probation. After a hearing, the trial court revoked Byra's

probation and sentenced him to thirty-six months' incarceration.

Byra's sentence after revocation was memorialized in a written judgment

and sentence rendered on March 12, 2018. The first page of this six-page order

contains a duplicative judgment of guilt for the same underlying felony battery offense

for which the court had previously adjudicated Byra guilty on April 6, 2016. This

duplicative judgment of guilt for the underlying felony battery offense was unauthorized.

See Butler v. State, 195 So. 3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("Duplicative

adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous,

are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings."). Thus, we

remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate the March 12, 2018, unauthorized

judgment of guilt for the underlying felony battery conviction because the trial court had

already adjudicated him guilty of the underlying offense on April 6, 2016. See Schaufler

-2- v. State, 255 So. 3d 929, 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); West v. State, 232 So. 3d 522, 523

(Fla. 2d DCA 2017). We affirm the revocation order and the corresponding sentence.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

-3-