Peter Spark v. Robert Sharpe

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2025
Docket24-2027
StatusUnpublished

This text of Peter Spark v. Robert Sharpe (Peter Spark v. Robert Sharpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peter Spark v. Robert Sharpe, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2027 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-2027

PETER SPARK; MARK EASTHAM,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

and

ALGERNON L. BUTLER, III,

Trustee - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT PAUL SHARPE ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (7:24-cv-00556-M-RJ)

Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025

Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. USCA4 Appeal: 24-2027 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 2 of 3

Robert Paul Sharpe, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Bircher, III, DAVIS HARTMAN WRIGHT PLLC, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-2027 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Robert Paul Sharpe appeals the district court’s order dismissing for failure to

comply with the filing requirements of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009 his appeal from the

bankruptcy court’s order remanding to state court an action that Sharpe had removed to the

bankruptcy court as an adversary proceeding. On appeal, Sharpe asks that his applications

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be restricted to court access only. We deny this

motion as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Spark v. Sharpe,

No. 7:24-cv-00556-M-RJ (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2024); see In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74-

75 (4th Cir. 1995) (explaining factors court should consider before dismissal). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Peter Spark v. Robert Sharpe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peter-spark-v-robert-sharpe-ca4-2025.