Peter Mark Lee v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 2, 2017·No. 04-16-00368-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

CONCURRING OPINION

No. 04-16-00368-CR

Peter Mark LEE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 493014

Honorable Genie Wright, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Irene Rios, Justice Concurring Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 2, 2017 I write separately on Issue No. 2 because I believe the record shows the trial court erred by permitting the EMT, Jovanca Liedl, to give expert testimony on the cause of Rachel Lee’s injuries. Before trial began, the trial court ruled that any State expert witness would be excluded based on the State’s failure to designate any experts. In permitting Liedl to give her professional opinion on the cause of Rachel’s injuries, over defense counsel’s objection that it constituted expert testimony, the trial court improperly characterized Liedl’s testimony as lay opinion testimony and admitted it on that basis. Liedl’s testimony that, in her opinion, the cause of Rachel’s injuries was “blunt force trauma” was not merely lay testimony based on Liedl’s personal observations or

Concurring Opinion 04-16-00368-CR

perceptions. See TEX. R. EVID. 701. Rather, the opinion testimony on causation was based on Liedl’s specialized “knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education” as a certified emergency medical technician within the meaning of Rule 702. See TEX. R. EVID. 702 (expert witness testimony); see also Chakravarthy v. State, 516 S.W.3d 116, 130-31 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg 2017, no pet.). Because the trial court had already excluded any State experts, and Liedl’s causation testimony was based on her medical training and specialized knowledge, her expert opinion testimony should have been excluded. However, because I agree with the majority that the error was harmless, I concur in the result on this issue.

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peter Mark Lee v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Peter Mark Lee v. State (Peter Mark Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chakravarthy v. State
516 S.W.3d 116 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017)