Peter J. Troglio v. Sherwin-Williams Company
This text of 369 F.2d 695 (Peter J. Troglio v. Sherwin-Williams Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This suit for slander was tried to the Court. The latter made twenty-seven specific fact findings, affirmatively holding that there were no communications made by defendant capable of defamatory interpretation; that there was no evidence in the entire record of any special harm or damage suffered by plaintiff which was proximately caused by any utterance or communication of defendant’s agents or employees; that the communications defendant did make were qualifiedly privileged.
Factually there was sufficient evidence to support the Court’s findings and we find no prejudicial trial errors of law.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
369 F.2d 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peter-j-troglio-v-sherwin-williams-company-ca3-1966.