Peter J Rhines v. Robert James Saunders
This text of Peter J Rhines v. Robert James Saunders (Peter J Rhines v. Robert James Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh 129956 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PETER J. RHINES, LINDA M. HATTIER Justices and MARY LOU RHINES, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 129956 COA: 258020 Keweenaw CC: 03-000486-CH ROBERT JAMES SAUNDERS and JAY
ASHLEY SAUNDERS,
Defendants-Appellants,
and CAROL A. CARLTON, as Trustee of
CAROL A. CARLTON TRUST,
Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 27, 2006 _________________________________________ d0320 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Peter J Rhines v. Robert James Saunders, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peter-j-rhines-v-robert-james-saunders-mich-2006.