Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden

Ninth Circuit

Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden

436 F.2d 418, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5804

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 24, 1970

Docket24835_1

StatusPublished

This text of 436 F.2d 418 (Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, 436 F.2d 418, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5804 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Zauner appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have assumed jurisdiction under Rule 22(b) of the F.R.App.Proc. and affirm.

Appellant committed a felony murder at age 16 and was convicted. He complains that Oregon law required the juvenile court to determine first that he committed the offense before remanding him to the state trial court for trial. The Oregon Supreme Court has held otherwise.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. Zauner v. Cupp, Warden, 320 F.Supp. 333 (D.C.Or.1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Zauner appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have assumed jurisdiction under Rule 22(b) of the F.R.App.Proc. and affirm.

Appellant committed a felony murder at age 16 and was convicted. He complains that Oregon law required the juvenile court to determine first that he committed the offense before remanding him to the state trial court for trial. The Oregon Supreme Court has held otherwise.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. Zauner v. Cupp, Warden, 320 F.Supp. 333 (D.C.Or.1969).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 F.2d 418, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peter-brent-zauner-v-hoyt-c-cupp-warden-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack