Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden

Ninth Circuit

Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden

436 F.2d 418, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5804

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 24, 1970·No. 24835_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Zauner appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have assumed jurisdiction under Rule 22(b) of the F.R.App.Proc. and affirm.

Appellant committed a felony murder at age 16 and was convicted. He complains that Oregon law required the juvenile court to determine first that he committed the offense before remanding him to the state trial court for trial. The Oregon Supreme Court has held otherwise.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. Zauner v. Cupp, Warden, 320 F.Supp. 333 (D.C.Or.1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Zauner appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have assumed jurisdiction under Rule 22(b) of the F.R.App.Proc. and affirm.

Appellant committed a felony murder at age 16 and was convicted. He complains that Oregon law required the juvenile court to determine first that he committed the offense before remanding him to the state trial court for trial. The Oregon Supreme Court has held otherwise.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. Zauner v. Cupp, Warden, 320 F.Supp. 333 (D.C.Or.1969).

Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, 436 F.2d 418, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5804 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

436 F.2d 418 (Peter Brent Zauner v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related