Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson
855 F.3d 694, 2017 WL 744030, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3564
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2017·No. 15-1869·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
A member of the en banc court sua sponte requested a poll in this case pursuant to 6 Cir. I.O.P. 35(e). A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, *695 and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson, 855 F.3d 694, 2017 WL 744030, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3564 (6th Cir. 2017).
855 F.3d 694 (Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson
870 F.3d 494 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Fields v. Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives
251 F. Supp. 3d 772 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2017)
American Humanist Association v. Birdville
851 F.3d 521 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)