Peter Augusta v. Hera Lighting, L. P.

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 23, 2013·No. A13A1821·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ May 23, 2013

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A13A1821. PETER AUGUSTA v. HERA LIGHTING, L. P.

Peter Augusta filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order denying his extraordinary motion for new trial.1 To appeal from an order denying an extraordinary motion for new trial, a party must file an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Because Augusta failed to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/23/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Augusta previously filed a motion for new trial, which the court denied. Augusta attempted to appeal from that denial, but we dismissed the appeal because the motion for new trial had not been timely filed. See Augusta v. Hera Lighting L. P., Case No. A12A1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peter Augusta v. Hera Lighting, L. P., (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).

Peter Augusta v. Hera Lighting, L. P. (Peter Augusta v. Hera Lighting, L. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Balkcom v. State
489 S.E.2d 129 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)