Petelik v. Motor Control Specialists

311 S.W.3d 828, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 193, 2010 WL 623932
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 23, 2010
DocketED 93220
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 311 S.W.3d 828 (Petelik v. Motor Control Specialists) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petelik v. Motor Control Specialists, 311 S.W.3d 828, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 193, 2010 WL 623932 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Motor Control Specialists and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) final award of worker’s compensation benefits to Stephen Petelik (“Claimant”) for an injury suffered to his low back as a result of an August 19, 2003 work accident. Appellants also appeal the decision of the Commission declining to review the ALJ’s temporary award of worker’s compensation benefits to Claimant. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s final award, which incorporates the temporary award, is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 S.W.3d 828, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 193, 2010 WL 623932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petelik-v-motor-control-specialists-moctapp-2010.