Pete Wright v. State of Missouri

394 F. App'x 327
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 2010
Docket10-1217
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 394 F. App'x 327 (Pete Wright v. State of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pete Wright v. State of Missouri, 394 F. App'x 327 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Pete Wright appeals the district court’s 1 partial dismissal and partial adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action alleging federal civil rights and state law tort claims. Following careful de novo review, we find that dismissal and summary judgment were appropriate for the reasons discussed in the district court’s orders. See Wojewski v. Rapid City Reg’l Hosp., 450 F.3d 338, 342 (8th Cir.2006) (de novo review of order granting summary judgment); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Wright’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Wood
179 L. Ed. 2d 508 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 F. App'x 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pete-wright-v-state-of-missouri-ca8-2010.