Pete Wright v. State of Missouri

394 F. App'x 327
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2010·No. 10-1217·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Pete Wright appeals the district court’s 1 partial dismissal and partial adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action alleging federal civil rights and state law tort claims. Following careful de novo review, we find that dismissal and summary judgment were appropriate for the reasons discussed in the district court’s orders. See Wojewski v. Rapid City Reg’l Hosp., 450 F.3d 338, 342 (8th Cir.2006) (de novo review of order granting summary judgment); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Wright’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pete Wright v. State of Missouri, 394 F. App'x 327 (8th Cir. 2010).

394 F. App'x 327 (Pete Wright v. State of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Wood
179 L. Ed. 2d 508 (Supreme Court, 2011)