Pete Mendez v. State
This text of Pete Mendez v. State (Pete Mendez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
• • • • • •
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00666-CR
Pete MENDEZ,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 253757
Honorable Monica E. Guerrero, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 16, 2009
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Based on our review of the record, it appears that appellant is seeking to appeal the trial court’s order modifying the conditions of his probation. An order modifying the terms and conditions of probation is not an appealable order. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). By order dated November 9, 2009, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing no later than fifteen days from the date of our order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On December 2, 2009, appellant’s attorney responded and agreed that the order is not an appealable order. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pete Mendez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pete-mendez-v-state-texapp-2009.