Pestle v. City of Miami

208 So. 3d 1253, 2017 WL 362515, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 738
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 2017
DocketNo. 3D15-2050
StatusPublished

This text of 208 So. 3d 1253 (Pestle v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pestle v. City of Miami, 208 So. 3d 1253, 2017 WL 362515, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sarasota Citizens for Responsible Gov’t v. City of Sarasota, 48 So.3d 755 (Fla. 2010) (finding private negotiations between deputy county administrator and members of the county board of commissioners, conducted for purposes of developing memorandum of understanding, did not violate Sunshine Law as no final action was taken and any violation would have been cured by subsequent pub-lically noticed meeting of the board); Tolar v. Sch. Bd. of Liberty Cnty., 398 So.2d 427, 429 (Fla. 1981) (“The Board’s action was not merely a ceremonial acceptance of secret actions and was not merely a perfunctory ratification of secret decisions at a later meeting open to the public.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tolar v. School Bd. of Liberty County
398 So. 2d 427 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Sarasota Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of Sarasota
48 So. 3d 755 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 So. 3d 1253, 2017 WL 362515, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pestle-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-2017.