Pestka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 20, 2015
Docket06-708
StatusPublished

This text of Pestka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Pestka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pestka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2015).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

********************* ROBERT PREVETTE, * No. 12-662V * Petitioner, * Special Master Moran * v. * Filed: March 24, 2015 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”); * Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Respondent. * Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”). *********************

Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner; Michael Milmoe, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On March 20, 2015, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Robert Prevette on October 2, 2012. In his petition, Mr. Prevette alleged that the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which he received on October 26, 2010, caused him to suffer Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”). Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from GBS, CIDP, or any other injury, and denies that his current disabilities are sequelae of a vaccine-related injury. 1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the party has 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as “Appendix A.” The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A. A lump sum payment of $1,008,453.61, which amount represents compensation for first year life care expenses ($114,043.62), lost earnings ($676,429.59), pain and suffering ($213,762.22), and past unreimbursable expenses ($4,218.18), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Robert Prevette; and

B. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the attached stipulation (“Appendix A”), paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 12-662V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357- 6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge. 2 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 2 of 8 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 3 of 8 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 4 of 8 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 5 of 8 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 6 of 8 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 7 of 8 Case 1:12-vv-00662-UNJ Document 54 Filed 03/20/15 Page 8 of 8

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pestka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pestka-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2015.